I always watch Mayweather fights with my drinking buddy who is a Mayweather hater. Anyway, he always bitches and moans about how Mayweather is a boring point fighter and never finishes. In his last fight against Guererro he was disgusted with Mayweather's performance and how the fight was boring and how he wasted his time and money and blah blah. I did agree that that fight was boring, but I told him that May still dominated Guererro. So that comment lead to a heated drunken debate about the definition of domination in boxing and MMA. His point was Mayweathers oponents hardly look like they've been in a fight. IMO, you dont need to beat the living shit out of someone in ring sports to dominate him.
Opinions? Can so called point fighters still be dominate?
Opinions? Can so called point fighters still be dominate?