http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...congress-kerry
While Obama had clearly stated he was providing "non-lethal" support for Syrian terrorists in the past, it seems now it is clear what many of us suspected was also true.
Keep in mind this attack is NOT the attack that happened a few days ago that ignorant plebs like Darkballs was unaware of. There was also no conclusive evidence that Assad was responsible, and a UN inspector said the rebels were responsible.
So how does everyone feel about arming terrorists?
Quote:
Obama began providing weapons to Syrian rebels after determining earlier this year that Assad had carried out a smaller-scale chemical attack. |
Keep in mind this attack is NOT the attack that happened a few days ago that ignorant plebs like Darkballs was unaware of. There was also no conclusive evidence that Assad was responsible, and a UN inspector said the rebels were responsible.
So how does everyone feel about arming terrorists?